FIRST ESSAY
The post-mortem monologue, Editor Whedon, by Edgar Lee Masters, is a dark portrayal of the underbelly of today’s society. The writer tries to get across the fact that the world is quintessentially filled with lies, dirt, and the quest for hurtful intentions. However, there is still that silver lining and people have the choice to change, and save their lives by choosing the high road in life. Through the use of tone and figurative language, the author is able to convey the theme of this haunting monologue to a wider audience, and achieves to strike a personal cord with the readers.
The tone of this monologue is nothing short of pessimism. The author is blunt when it comes to describing the fake, self-seeking, scandalous, and wicked ways humans can behave. He examines multiple corners and instances of human discourse, thus giving his monologue an exposé sort of tone. Knowing that he was probably eye-witness to most occurrences, this gives his piece a more personal tone. Nevertheless there’s a change in tone towards the end of the monologue, as the author presents the idea of triumphing over the evil; “derails the express train”, where the tone is that of hope and renewed faith in life.
The figurative language also plays a crucial role in giving this monologue greater meaning and emphasis. The author repeats the word “To” and “To be” on multiple occasions with a technique known as anaphora. Through anaphora, humanity is portrayed to have infinite abilities of manifesting benevolence onto the world, but also the abilities to save one’s own life from this force; “to win at any cost.” The author also uses hyperboles throughout his piece to exaggerate and intensify the corruption in the world, for example “glory to the demoniac power” and “paranoiac boy”. Lastly, the author relies on juxtaposition throughout parts of the poem, allowing his readers to take on the piece in distinctly personal ways, and leaving room for ambiguity.
SECOND ESSAY
The story of the once beautiful young woman that embarked to Milan, and ended up as a cripple years later back in her parents’ house, displays the complex character of Madeline Standhope. Her last name alone serves a paradox for something that she chooses to never do again by herself, and that is stand. Nevertheless her manipulation of people helps her regain that “hope”; and shows off the multifaceted aspect of her personality and misleading character along the way.
The “It girl” of Italy, who had captured the hearts of all. Ironically enough, Madeline choose to marry a disreputable man of “harsh temper and swarthy face” named Paulo Neroni. Just the idea that she picked Paulo over any other man shows lack of good, well thought out judgment. It also makes the reader question Madeline’s credibility, intelligence, and most importantly self-honesty. Madeline then turns into quite the conformist and “obedient wife” type as she stays in Rome with Paulo, where “his” life and career are already established. The author describes him as “vainly endeavored to induce his wife to remain behind him.” Knowing this, it seems that Madeline was willing to sacrifice her true self and character for a man she probably didn’t even love, and “probably had no alternative.”
Six months after wards she turns home to her parents as a cripple and mother. At this point in the story, Madeline’s complex character clearly shines through. The reader can infer that she is most likely a liar when it comes to explaining how she really became a cripple to her parents. “Falling in ascending a ruin” is probably a cover up for extreme martial abuse she may have endured at the hands of Paulo. This shows that as a character she has too much pride and is most likely embarrassed to cope with her failed marriage. Madeline might also be trying to avoid having fingers pointed at her, and being criticized for her bad choice in husband. Like the readers, it can be inferred that her parents might shun her marriage, and more importantly her bad decision making when it comes to a choice of husband.
Despite being a cripple, Madeline never lets the outside world be aware of her disability. She can be viewed as peculiar in her over exaggerated techniques to come off more pretentious, especially the way she conducts herself in public at “the opera” and “saloons of the noblesse.” By using her charms, and her past life in Rome to create a less commonplace and hard life for herself, she effectively covers her disability, and the mistakes she made in her marriage. “It was impossible that have purpose could have been achieved with less” (servants and helpers).She can in this sense be viewed as cunning, and ingenious. However deep down inside, Madeline is no longer the radiant and independent teenager. In reality Madeline morphs into a superficial and manipulating personality.
THIRD ESSAY
Oftentimes, a novel centers around a “radical thinker” whose vision contradicts that of the norm. In the novel The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, this idea manifests itself best through the character of Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale, who becomes the victim of an internal dilemma after he commits adultery, and has a secret lovechild, Pearl, with the town exile, Hester Prynne. The conflict between what’s expected of him in society, his independent thoughts, and haunting secret are what tear Dimmesdale apart. Through him, Hawthorne employs his novel with a radical thinker, willing to challenge God and society for what he truly believes in.
Just the fact alone that a revered Reverend would commit adultery in his strict Puritan community can be considered radical of the times. It shows that even the respected and holy can fall victim to sin and evil. Nevertheless, months later as Hester Prynne is released from jail and made to stand upon a scaffold, it is Dimmesdale that exhorts her to reveal the name of the man who was her lover. This act could also be considered as radical because it shows that Dimmesdale would easily give up his respected position for what he feels is moral. This seems to also be one of the central themes of the novel. Luckily, Hester refuses to fault Dimmesdale in front of society thus protecting his reputation for nearly a decade.
As he holds the secret hidden in him, Dimmesdale physical appearance and health also seem to change significantly. Radically, he disfigures his body through self-masochism, and denigrates mentally and spiritually. After being reunited with Hester years later, Dimmesdale switches gears, as he plans that he will leave the community and move with her to Europe. This move is none the less radical, as it shows that he would easily give up one of the most respectable positions in society to be with the woman he still has feelings for. It also could be considered as drastic because he never before considered this plan. As a result the once conservative Reverend turns into an invincible man, ready to release his inhibitions and carry out his life the way he, and not society wants it.
The climax of Dimmesdale’s reign as a radical thinker comes at the end of the novel when all is revealed to the public through a sermon he gives. Dimmesdale, unable to cope with all the lies admits to being an adulterer and Pearl’s father. In the eyes of the community by breaking the law, Dimmesdale also broke God’s law. This idea portrays Dimmesdale’s society as intolerant, which shuns any form of human faults and temptations. However it is only through his confession that this radical thinker can finally find peace.